YOUR KEYS. YOUR CAPITAL.

EXPLORE

OverviewFind walletLiquidity poolsTokenNew pool radarWatchlist

YOUR CAPITAL

Wallet profileTransactionsAutomationSwap

ECOSYSTEM

Network statusDocumentationGuidesArticlesDevelopersSettings
BANIPOOL/Articles

Search pools

Paste or type a pool address, pool ID, token address, or token symbol. All networks are searched at once.

A token address shows pools that use that token.

Create new pool

Connect wallet

Choose a wallet on this device or connect your phone wallet with a QR code.

Detected wallets

No browser wallet detected. Use WalletConnect for a wallet on your phone.

Signing in to view your portfolio does not authorize transactions.

← All articles · Baca dalam Bahasa Indonesia

Concentrated Liquidity vs Full-Range AMM (x·y=k): Which Earns More?

November 11, 2026

Quick answer

Concentrated liquidity (Uniswap v3, Orca, Meteora DLMM) places LP capital only within a chosen price range, so fees per dollar are much higher, but the position stops earning when the price leaves the range and needs maintenance. A full-range AMM (x·y=k: Uniswap v2, Raydium CPMM, PumpSwap) spreads liquidity over all prices: lower fees per dollar, but always active with no maintenance.

BaniPool data as of November 13, 2026: 92.6% of the TVL across the 58 large pools (TVL ≥ $1M) we track is in concentrated-liquidity pools.

Live data from the BaniPool index (pools with TVL ≥ $1M), refreshed every 30 minutes — full DeFi liquidity report

Concentrated Liquidity vs Full-Range AMM (x·y=k): Which Earns More?

Concentrated liquidity (Uniswap v3, Orca, Meteora DLMM) vs full-range AMMs (Uniswap v2, Raydium CPMM, PumpSwap): fees, risk, maintenance, and when to choose each.

Concentrated Liquidity vs Full-Range AMM (x·y=k): Which Earns More?

Concentrated liquidity vs full-range AMM is the first decision you face before adding liquidity. A full-range AMM (the x·y=k formula) spreads liquidity across every price and never goes "out of range". Concentrated liquidity lets you focus capital in a chosen price range, so fees per dollar can multiply — as long as the position is maintained. This guide compares both with DEX examples, data, and a decision guide.

Concentrated liquidity vs AMM: liquidity distribution chart on BaniPool

Side-by-side comparison

Full-range AMM (x·y=k)Concentrated liquidity
Example DEXesUniswap v2, Raydium CPMM, PumpSwap, Meteora DAMM v2Uniswap v3/v4, Aerodrome Slipstream, Orca Whirlpools, Raydium CLMM, Meteora DLMM
Price rangeAll pricesYou choose
Fees per dollarLowerHigher while in range
Out of range?NeverYes — fees stop
Impermanent lossStandardAmplified in narrow ranges
MaintenanceAlmost noneNeeds rebalancing
Position formLP tokenNFT / position account

Full-range AMM (x·y=k)

Your liquidity spans from zero to infinity. Only a small slice of it is used near the current price, so fees per dollar are lower. The advantage is simplicity: deposit both tokens at the current ratio and leave it. Fees go straight into position value (Raydium CPMM, PumpSwap) or are claimed separately (Meteora DAMM v2).

Good for: new tokens with wild price swings, passive LPs, and pools where most volume comes from routers.

Concentrated liquidity

You pick a lower and upper price. While the price is inside, your capital provides as much depth as a much larger full-range position — and earns proportionally more fees. Real example (BaniPool data, November 10, 2026): SOL/USDC on Orca, 0.04%, TVL $24.5M, 24h volume $112M, Fee APR ~69%. Positions whose range covers the active price capture that rate in full.

Trade-offs:

  • When the price leaves the range, the position holds one token only and stops earning fees.
  • Impermanent loss inside the range is larger — see impermanent loss explained.
  • It needs rebalancing: withdraw and re-add around the new price.

Meteora DLMM is a special variant with price bins and dynamic fees — see Meteora DLMM strategies.

Which earns more?

  • Stable pairs (USDC/USDT, SOL/JitoSOL): concentrated liquidity with a narrow range almost always wins.
  • Major volatile pairs (ETH/USDC, SOL/USDC): concentrated with a wider range, maintained by automation.
  • New / meme tokens: full-range or a very wide range. Prices can move 10× in a day.
  • No time to monitor: full-range, or concentrated with automated rebalancing.

On BaniPool

  • EVM concentrated pools, Orca and Raydium CLMM use Pool Studio: price chart, liquidity distribution, fee simulator and range backtest.
  • Raydium CPMM, PumpSwap, Meteora DAMM v2 and Meteora DLMM use the liquidity panel to deposit, withdraw (25/50/100%) and claim fees.
  • Every transaction is simulated before you sign.

FAQ

Is concentrated liquidity always more profitable?

No. It wins while the price stays in range and fees exceed the amplified impermanent loss. If the price leaves the range often, full-range can do better.

What happens when a position goes out of range?

It holds a single token and earns no fees until the price returns or you move the range (rebalance).

Is Uniswap v4 concentrated liquidity?

Yes. Uniswap v4 uses concentrated liquidity like v3, plus custom fees and hooks.

Related articles

Liquidity Pool Rug Pull Warning Signs: Collapsing TVL, Token Authorities & How to Protect Your Position

Spot rug-pull warning signs before and after depositing into a liquidity pool: collapsing TVL, mint/freeze authority, large holders, honeypots, fake volume — and how to protect your LP position.

What Is a Liquidity Pool? How It Works, Rewards & Risks (2026)

What Is a Liquidity Pool? How It Works, Rewards & Risks (2026)

A liquidity pool is a pair of tokens locked in a smart contract that powers swaps on a DEX. Learn how it works, how LPs earn fees, the risks, and real APR data.

How to Add Liquidity on Base: Uniswap vs Aerodrome (2026 Guide)

How to Add Liquidity on Base: Uniswap vs Aerodrome (2026 Guide)

Add liquidity on Base with Uniswap v3/v4 or Aerodrome: key differences, top pool APR data, Zap In with ETH, AERO rewards, and why Base needs no private mempool.